Skip to main content

The Galileo Project - A Compelling Complementary Course to SETI

There is a certain stigma attached to the subject of investigation of extraterrestrial life. Often ridiculed by the mainstream scientific community and media by pushing it out of the fringes of mainstream science and topics. The term Ufology, though not derogatory by origin has acquired certain negative connotations in the mainstream media. But when the head of the Centre for Astrophysics at the Harvard University, Dr Abraham (Avi) Loeb puts forward compelling arguments to pursue this subject, the whole scenario changes drastically. The scientific credentials of this person are enough to prove this person's solemn intentions to pursue this subject. For most of the scientific community, this may seem like a suicidal move for his career backed by their experience of ridicule received by many of their predecessors. But, Dr Loeb is a staunch believer in scientific curiosity. Fuelled by his contagious scientific vigour, he has embarked on a journey in a practically uncharted territory of investigation of extraterrestrial life. 

As stated in his statement (Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian) on 26th July 2021, Dr Loeb has launched a new project called "The Galileo Project" to identify the nature of UAP and ‘Oumuamua-like interstellar objects using the standard scientific method based on a transparent analysis of open scientific data to be collected using optimized instruments. This in itself is a groundbreaking initiative as till today the subject was always looked down on with condescension by the mainstream scientific community and was pursued by people from all walks of life without any structured methodology. 

Of course, there is a respectable exception to that stereotype and that is the original SETI project (Wikipedia Contributors), (History of the SETI Institute | SETI Institute). It is tempting and also felicitous to compare the two. First thing first, the Galileo project is by no means a competitor to the SETI project. Au contraire, it is exploring another path towards the same goal or destination. Having said that the SETI project is focused on detecting signs of alien life through electromagnetic radiation whereas the Galileo project focuses on searching for technological signatures in the forms of satellites or other physical artefacts. 

The goal of this project is precise and absolutely no-nonsense. In their own words, it is, "to bring the search for extraterrestrial technological signatures of Extraterrestrial Technological Civilizations (ETCs) from accidental or anecdotal observations and legends to the mainstream of transparent, validated and systematic scientific research". In my opinion, this is the first time a conscious effort is being made to look for physical signatures of extraterrestrial life (SETI looks for EM radiation and not physical artefacts) in a mainstream establishment. This makes the project a first of its kind event. 

The inspiration behind this project was "Oumuamua" (In-Depth | Oumuamua – NASA Solar System Exploration), the famous interstellar object that was first observed in 2017.  It warrants a separate article to see why this seemingly mundane event is truly unique in mankind's history. But to give a brief idea, it was the first object observed by human beings that entered our solar system from outside of it. On top of it, it possessed so strange properties that it created a storm of opinions and shattered all the things we knew so far about asteroids and interplanetary objects. From here, Dr Loeb decided to search and study more such objects in the hope of finding something incredible and entirely beyond the limits of human understanding. 

Lastly, as stated by Dr Loeb in his interview (Rath and Baskin), he is not afraid of being proven wrong. Even if the outcome of this project proves that 'Oumuamua' or similar objects are a natural phenomenon and not a sign of extraterrestrial technological civilization, it will be a massive discovery to expand the horizons of human understanding about the cosmos. That's what makes this project so special. I for one am excited to see the progress of this project and learn more about its outcomes. I wish all the success to the project team. 


References

Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian. “The Galileo Project: ‘Daring to Look through New Telescopes.’” Projects.iq.harvard.edu, 26 July 2021, projects.iq.harvard.edu/galileo.


“History of the SETI Institute | SETI Institute.” Seti.org, 2013, www.seti.org/history-seti-institute.


“In Depth | Oumuamua – NASA Solar System Exploration.” NASA Solar System Exploration, 27 Mar. 2019, solarsystem.nasa.gov/asteroids-comets-and-meteors/comets/oumuamua/in-depth/.


Rath, Arun, and Matt Baskin. “UFO Hunting, with Harvard Data: Astrophysicist Advocates for Scientific Investigation.” GBH 89.7, GBH 98.7 / WGBH Radio, 3 Aug. 2021, www.wgbh.org/news/science-and-technology/2021/08/02/ufo-hunting-with-harvard-data-astrophysicist-advocates-for-scientific-investigation.


Wikipedia Contributors. “Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 29 Nov. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_for_extraterrestrial_intelligence.


Yang, Maya. “Galileo Project: Scientists to Search for Signs of Extraterrestrial Technology.” The Guardian, 27 July 2021, www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jul/27/galileo-project-search-signs-extraterrestrial-technology.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In the Abyss of the Cosmos: Confronting the Terrifying Choice Between Absolute Solitude and the Haunting Presence of the Unknown

O ne of the most profound questions humanity faces is: Are we alone in the universe? Despite the vastness of space and the abundance of potentially life-supporting planets, we haven't, at least officially, encountered any extraterrestrial life forms. This leads to a deeper contemplation: Which is more unsettling—being alone in the universe or not? In my view, being alone is the more daunting prospect. Here's why: Life is an Anomaly and not a Rule : If we are truly alone, it implies that the life and especially the intelligent life is just an anomaly. It is not a common occurrence as a result of certain life generating conditions. Essentially, life then becomes a glitch in the normal order of the universe. Emotional Implication : Being alone may lead to being lonely on a cosmic level. It eliminates the possibility of any sort of "cultural exchange". The dreadful solitude will deny any chance of sharing the mysteries of the universe and existential thoughts with anyone ...

Nasadiya Suktam : The Creation Hymn - A tale before time, exploring the "Nasadiya Suktam" through a modern lens

Even though I am not qualified to discuss deeper cosmological and philosophical questions, I am always fascinated by these topics. For example, ever since I heard about the big bang in school, I have always wonderd that what was there before big bang?! I am sure all the great minds in cosmology are working hard to find an answer to this question. But my mind was blown when I learned that there is a Hymn from Rigveda that precisely asks these questions. That proved two things, first, this question, how everything started is unanswered for millenia. And secondly, the people who asked it at least 4500 years ago were not primitive by any measure.  Asking questions like this shows a certain level of advanced thinking. Excusing myself for a little detour I would like to take this opportunity to point out that this has been a theme in the ancient vedic texts. The vedic texts are a treasure trove for philosophical discussions. Moving back to the topic, this hymn from Rigveda is in the 10t...

Abiogenesis Vs Panspermia - Why Life is Extremely Rare in the Universe?

T he very first or one of the very first candidates for the great filter is the first instance of the genesis of organic matter. In case of earth, two prominent candidates that come out on top as the answers to this question are 'panspermia' and 'abiogenesis'. Both of these questions answer many questions and give rise to many others. One important thing to keep in mind is that these two are competing theories only in case of earth. If we consider the universe as a whole abiogenesis has the potential to answer the question how does life start anywhere? This will be more clear as we discuss these in more detail in this article. In this article we will briefly see both the concepts and some of the intriguing possibilities arsing from them. Also, we will see how this ties up with the great filter hypothesis and the rarity of life in the universe.  Panspermia The word ' panspermia ' is derived from the Greek words "Pan" meaning all and "Sperma" m...